![]() ![]() Re: reviews, Our Shotgrid review pipeline is reasonably straightforward, the supe and team will largely be in office. Remoting to a box in house is definitely my preferred option, but I need to prepare for that not being the case and see what options are available, the last few years have really sent a few unusual workflows my way and I want to minimize any last-minute patchwork solutions when we're under the pump. Eventually the review suite needs to suit them as much as possible - it's all about notes. Could be a bit hard to get flying with TPN though.ĭo you also need to handle remote vendor review pipelines and deliveries? If so there's a bunch of thoughts I have on that process I'd be happy to share.įinally, if you're not the actual vfx supervisor or whomever will be reviewing all this yourself then it's worth consulting with that person in depth. If security allows that's not a bad thing to consider, being completely virtual and spinning up the machines as needed. I've seen some people work completely on AWS for this sort of project too. If you go with the above method of having everyone remote in to the office then you can effectively just treat it like a regular in-house solution. To get it integrated you'll want someone who is pipeline savvy to build that for you (which is hard to find right now honestly). Shotgrid is a solid solution for managing your review workflow. If you're needing to deal with TPN conditions for your project then you'll want boxes in your office with artists remoting in via one of the many methods available - other people can comment on which they prefer. Perforce - I've used this briefly as a client in a different pipeline with a smaller asset pool, but I'm genuinely interested in this as an option so I'd love to hear from anyone with experience with this or similar platforms for a shot based workflow.Probably my favorite for ease and security if you have the bandwidth, but places the costs and management of hardware and licenses on the production which mightn't be ideal for shorter post periods/tighter budgets. Had a look at some pre-built solutions out there a while ago but they were a bit too closed/inflexible at the time for some of our workflows without consistent and active support/development. Something I'm diving deeper into learning. Sending the artist a Remote-managed NAS to mirror work directories - Pretty good for passively keeping the team in sync, but harder to scale as for each artist you this comes with an upfront equipment cost, configuration, delivery time, and some more advanced admin requirements.Aspera Files sync (not to be confused with Aspera Packages) - Kill it with fire. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |